Top 10 RSA Archer Alternatives for Smarter GRC in 2025

Third-party onboarding:

Standardize intake, due diligence, and segmentation based on service type, risk level, or regulatory exposure.

SLA and credentialing tracking:

Monitor certifications, contract terms, expirations, and risk flags in one system.

Risk scoring engine:

Assign and update risk levels with pre-built controls, self-assessments, and document verification.

Regulatory framework support:

Align vendor evaluations with HIPAA, SOC 2, ISO 27001, NIST 800-53, and more.

Control testing and audit logging:

Capture workflow history, review results, and prepare for audits with minimal manual cleanup.

Dashboarding and alerts:

Highlight vendors that require action based on missing responses, overdue renewals, or escalating risk scores.

TPRM-first architecture, ideal for scaling vendor governance programs without heavy system customization.

Includes workflow automation, response tracking, and audit logs, ready to support regulatory readiness from day one.

Configurable templates let you build assessments aligned with your policies without coding or external consultants.

Vendor scorecards and dashboards help prioritize actions and give leadership a clear view of third-party exposure.

Built-in AI supports continuous monitoring and helps identify emerging risks early.

Integrated risk management: 

Prebuilt modules for managing risk, business continuity, privacy, and third-party oversight in a single environment.

Workflow automation: 

Automate manual risk and compliance processes with no-code workflows that span departments.

Centralized control mapping: 

Track risks, policies, and controls across IT, security, and compliance teams in one platform.

AI-driven insights: 

Use real-time data and intelligence to prioritize actions and monitor risk posture continuously.

Strong fit for enterprises already invested in the ServiceNow ecosystem

No-code customization and automation help reduce manual work

Scales well across global organizations and compliance domains

Users found the interface “not user intuitive” and navigation difficult

Reporting tools were described as limited, with weak filtering and data visualization

Timeout issues were reported, leading to potential data loss or missed notifications

Knowledge transfer was challenging due to platform inconsistencies between organizations

Some users noted gaps in documentation and limited troubleshooting support

Modules were flagged for not consistently aligning with NIST standards

Risk ripple analytics: 

AI-powered tools to identify hidden risks across departments and predict potential downstream impacts.

ERM and governance frameworks:

Benchmark your program using the Risk Maturity Model (RMM) and deliver ready-to-present board reports.

Business continuity and IT governance:

Support for planning, incident management, and policy mapping for cybersecurity and operational resilience.

Jobs-to-be-done licensing model: 

Avoid seat-based pricing with a licensing approach based on business outcomes and team function.

Centralized ERM, audit, and compliance management with a governance-first approach

Built-in benchmarking tools (RMM) for board-level reporting and maturity assessments

Fixed-cost pricing with dedicated analyst support and customizable configuration

Strong usability scores in risk and business continuity categories

Users report limited flexibility in ad-hoc reporting and challenges in meeting leadership data needs

Lacks advanced customization and has difficulty with complex workflows or deep integrations

Reporting can be slow, and ERP features may not scale well for large enterprises

Interface simplicity can become limiting; no undo function, and standard templates are limited

Integration APIs may lag; some users note additional costs for EU data hosting

Modular deployment:

Activate domain-specific modules as needed

AI and predictive insights: 

Embedded analytics for smarter GRC operations

Integrated compliance workflows: 

Automates mapping and tracking of regulations

Third-party risk mapping: 

Categorizes vendor risk hierarchies, KRIs, and SLAs

Privacy and ESG management: 

Built-in modules for data privacy and ESG risk compliance

Policy lifecycle control: 

End-to-end management of policy creation, approvals, and mapping

Broad modular coverage across risk, audit, compliance, and ESG domains

Embedded AI and analytics provide contextual insights and risk prioritization

Strong regulatory alignment, including support for NIST, ISO 27001, UCF, and GDPR

Integrates with tools like SecurityScorecard and Thomson Reuters for external risk data

Steep learning curve; new users report difficulty adopting without significant training

High cost relative to other GRC tools, with expensive implementation cycles

A cumbersome user interface, described as outdated and unintuitive

Weak documentation and a lack of best practice guidance for implementation

Integration capabilities are limited; automation lacks flexibility

Users noted poor support for bulk actions and frequent performance lags

Enterprise risk management: 

Multidimensional risk scoring, analytics, and federated data modeling.

Compliance automation: 

AI-powered issue tracking and regulatory content mapping.

Cyber and IT compliance: 

Control validation, threat analysis, and FAIR-based quantification.

Third-party risk management: 

Vendor tiering, SLA monitoring, and continuous performance scoring.

Audit and ESG: 

Automated audit workflows and ESG disclosures aligned with SASB, TCFD.

Modular and scalable across GRC, ESG, and third-party risk

Embedded AI/ML for compliance, audit, and risk remediation

Unified dashboards for policy, risk, and vendor metrics

Regulatory intelligence feeds for global compliance frameworks

Flexible control and risk mapping across functions

Users noted the UI feels outdated, and onboarding requires support

Lacks bulk upload options; requires more manual configuration than expected

Workflow and data relationships are complex and difficult to customize

Integration between modules is slow and sometimes fragmented

Some functions are locked or inflexible without developer-level support

Workflow automation: 

Automate audits, assessments, and compliance tasks using dynamic workflows.

Spark AI: 

Opt-in AI capabilities for control mapping, risk summaries, and decision support.

Third-party risk management: 

Out-of-the-box questionnaires (SIG, NIST, CAIQ), risk tiering, and compromise tracking.

Risk Cloud Quantify®: 

Turn risk into financial language using FAIR-based simulations and impact estimates.

Modular platform: 

40+ applications including Cyber Risk, ESG, Privacy, SOX, and Incident Management.

Drag-and-drop no-code interface makes configuration faster for non-technical users

Supports SOC 2, ISO 27001, NIST, and GDPR frameworks with ready templates

Prebuilt integrations with Slack, Okta, Jira, Black Kite, and more

Real-time dashboards for risk, audit, and third-party performance

Users say the platform has a steep learning curve and a complex initial setup

Dashboard customization is limited and can feel clunky for end users

Audit evidence collection is more manual compared to competitors

Licensing costs for limited users can escalate unexpectedly

Advanced configurations often require LogicGate’s support team to execute

Dynamic risk workflows: 

Automate assessments, audits, and controls with scalable workflow templates.

Third-party risk management: 

Centralized onboarding, monitoring, and compliance training with real-time alerts.

AI-powered intelligence: 

Identify emerging risks and patterns through embedded AI and dashboards.

Integrated compliance and ethics: 

Deliver policy training and disclosures aligned with evolving regulations.

Global standards mapping: 

Supports frameworks like NIST, ISO 27001, SCF, COSO, and Basel II/III.

Third-party risk oversight with integrations like SecurityScorecard and Argos Risk

Wide range of compliance modules covering IT, audit, ethics, and incident management

Automated vendor reassessments, regulatory feeds, and policy training

Unified dashboarding across business units and risk domains

Regulatory mapping and AI features enhance program maturity tracking

Workflow setup is difficult and time-consuming, especially for complex use cases

Reporting can be inconsistent, users report delays, and limited customization

UI glitches and slow load times hinder a smooth experience across teams

Cost structure can be a barrier for small to mid-sized organizations

Integration with other tools requires additional manual effort or workarounds

Users mentioned sales experience as aggressive or inflexible

Dynamic risk intelligence: 

Delivers predictive risk scoring and analytics to help prioritize threats and compliance gaps.

Continuous Control Monitoring (CCM): 

Enables automated tracking and alerts on control failures across IT and operational environments.

Pre-built compliance frameworks: 

Support for ISO 27001, NIST, PCI-DSS, GDPR, and HIPAA for faster onboarding and audits.

Third-party and IT risk management:

Centralized management of vendor assessments, SLAs, and cyber posture with pre-integrated tools.

Workflow automation and no-code configurability: 

Drag-and-drop modules and task workflows that reduce dependency on developers.

Dynamic Risk Intelligence engine for predictive GRC analytics

Extensive support for industry frameworks: ISO 27001, NIST, GDPR, PCI-DSS, HIPAA

Real-time dashboards and Continuous Control Monitoring

Pre-built integrations with Jira, ServiceNow, RiskRecon, and SecurityScorecard

Customizable, no-code platform with strong client support

Reporting and dashboards lack modern BI features like drill-down and multi-field sorting

Steep learning curve for new users, especially transitioning from spreadsheets

Performance lags when handling large datasets or complex dashboards

Integrations like Jira and ServiceNow can require lengthy setup periods

Some customization relies heavily on SureCloud support, reducing self-service flexibility

Enterprise GRC: 

Unified dashboard for governance, compliance, and internal audit.

Third-party risk management: 

Centralized onboarding, SLA tracking, and supplier risk scoring.

Healthcare and ESG modules: 

Specialized compliance, incident tracking, and ESG performance monitoring.

Active risk manager: 

Project-level to enterprise-wide risk rollups, heat maps, and cost impact analytics.

AI-enhanced insights: 

Predictive analytics, intuitive dashboards, and automated workflows for risk correlation.

Broad suite covering GRC, healthcare, ESG, third-party, and IT risk

Configurable modules for enterprise- or project-level risk rollups

The Active Risk Manager tool supports bowtie diagrams and cost analysis

Offers both cloud and on-prem hosting options for regulated industries

Reporting tools are not intuitive; users expect easier custom report creation

Delays and follow-ups are often needed for customer support execution

Implementation timelines may stretch due to configuration complexity

Users noted a lack of transparency in security communications

Audit-ready automation: 

Automates evidence collection, control monitoring, and audit workflows across all major standards.

Compliance stack support: 

Covers 20+ frameworks including SOC 2, HIPAA, CCPA, ISO 27017, CMMC 2.0, and FedRAMP.

Async audits: 

Facilitates fully asynchronous audits through integrated auditor coordination from within the platform.

Cloud-first integration: 

Connects with over 200+ cloud services, enabling seamless control mapping and real-time checks.

Built specifically for cloud-native, fast-scaling tech companies

Pre-mapped controls and low-footprint setup accelerate time to compliance

Supports layered compliance programs across multiple frameworks

Async audits reduce coordination fatigue and speed up turnaround

Users noted that reporting features are limited and lack in-depth drill-down capability

Limited flexibility for non-standard frameworks or hybrid environments

Some teams felt the UI could be more intuitive for non-technical users

Depth of customization in automation flows may require expert support

Certain onboarding steps may need clearer documentation for first-time users