Atlas Systems Named a Representative Vendor in 2025 Gartner® Market Guide for TPRM Technology Solutions → Read More

Collaborative Vendor Assessment Workflows

Stop chasing questionnaires. ComplyScore® brings vendors and assessors into one shared workspace with real-time visibility into tasks, progress, and evidence.

Collaborative Vendor Assessment Workflows

Assessment Chaos Lives in Your Inbox

Questionnaires bounce across email threads. Vendors send version 7 while you're reviewing version 4. One vendor contact manually routes 300 questions to internal teams while your analysts wait weeks for responses that never arrive complete. 

ComplyScore® Eliminates Email Chaos with One Shared Workspace

ComplyScore®'s collaborative workflows replace email threads with a live workspace where vendors and assessors see the same tasks, progress, and evidence in real time. No attachments, no version conflicts, and no waiting. 

Selection (66).v1

Shared Visibility and Task Delegation

Fragmented workflows slow down third-party risk reviews and create unnecessary back-and-forth. A shared workspace brings structure and accountability to every assessment, without your team coordinating internal handoffs.

  • Real-time visibility into what’s complete, pending, or needs clarification
  • Vendors route security, legal, and compliance tasks to the right owners
  • Clear ownership reduces delays and follow-ups
  • Faster, more consistent assessments with less overhead
Selection (68)

Inline Clarifications and Real-Time Updates

Disjointed email threads and offline comments make assessments harder to track and easier to misinterpret. Inline collaboration keeps every clarification tied to the right question and visible to all stakeholders.

  • Assessors flag gaps or concerns directly within specific questions
  • Vendors respond in-thread, with full context preserved
  • Evidence uploads, comments, and updates sync instantly across teams
  • Fewer misunderstandings, faster resolution, and a complete audit trail
Selection (69).v1

Parallel Workflows Without Bottlenecks

Sequential reviews slow assessments and create avoidable delays. Parallel workflows let vendors and internal teams move forward at the same time, without stepping on each other’s work.

  • Multiple contributors work in parallel across sections
  • IT handles technical controls while compliance covers regulatory items
  • No waiting on a single reviewer to move forward
  • Faster assessments with fewer workflow delays

What Collaborative Workflows Unlock

Faster Completion

Assessments close in days, not weeks. Vendors work in parallel across departments. Your team reviews as sections complete instead of waiting for one massive final submission. 

Fewer Back-and-Forth Loops

endors see what's missing as they respond. Inline guidance shows expected evidence formats. Discrepancies get flagged immediately, not after final submission. 

No Primary Contact Bottleneck

Vendor contacts delegate directly within the portal. IT admins answer technical questions. Compliance leads handle regulatory items. Work flows to the right people automatically. 

Complete Audit Trail

Every assignment, comment, edit, and evidence upload logs automatically. Show auditors exactly who answered what, when, and what evidence they provided—all timestamped and attributed. 

Integrate With Your Existing Systems

Vendor Access Channels

 

Invite vendors via email or SSO. No new tools to learn, no portal friction, vendors work the way they already do.

 

Enterprise System Sync


Connect workflows with ERP and GRC systems like SAP, Oracle, NetSuite, ServiceNow, Archer, and LogicGate.

Single Source of Truth

 

Responses stay synchronized across systems. No duplicate entries. No version conflicts.

 

Audit-Ready Collaboration

ComplyScore® captures every vendor interaction with full context, creating defensible audit trails without manual tracking. 

 

Every action is logged with clear ownership, timestamps, and evidence—ready when auditors ask.

 
 

Map Once. Comply Everywhere.

  • Support vendor transparency for GDPR, CCPA, and DPDP

  • Meet documentation requirements for DORA, SOX, and HIPAA

  • Maintain assessment audit trails for ISO 27001 and SOC 2

quote

Atlas far exceeds our requirements...

One of the key differentiators between Atlas and other governance, risk and compliance and 3rd party risk management tools is the ease of use of the Atlas solutions. Also from a total cost of ownership perspective, Atlas far exceeds those requirements in terms of being very cost efficient in delivering all this.

Izhar Mujaddidi,

Senior Director, Cybersecurity, Carelon Behavioral Health ​

quote

ComplyScore is highly responsive and adaptable

ComplyScore is highly responsive and adaptable to our evolving processes and requirements, proving to be a trusted partner at every step. Their security analysts were knowledgeable, flexible, and delivered exceptional services that consistently exceeded our expectations.

Enterprise Client

G2 Review (Jan 2025)

quote

My experience has been largely positive

I have been using ComplyScore for several months and my experience has been largely positive. The platform provides comprehensive solutions for compliance management and streamlines our operations efficiently.

Mid-Market Company,​

Gartner Peer Insights (Sep 2024)

Frequently Asked Questions

Can vendors add their own team members without our approval?

Vendors control their internal workspace. They add team members and assign sections without waiting for approval. You see who's assigned and track progress without managing their coordination.

What happens if a vendor uploads the wrong evidence?

Assessors flag discrepancies directly on the question. The system alerts the responsible vendor team member immediately. Vendors replace or clarify evidence inline—no separate email thread.

Do we lose visibility if vendors delegate internally?

No. You see every assignment, who owns each section, and progress status. If someone becomes a bottleneck, both teams spot it and reassign before deadlines slip.

How do we track who made which changes?

Every action logs with user attribution and timestamp. Trace every response, evidence upload, and approval back to the specific person who performed it.