Atlas Systems Named a Representative Vendor in 2025 Gartner® Market Guide for TPRM Technology Solutions → Read More
.png?width=869&height=597&name=image%20(5).png)
.png?width=300&height=175&name=Rectangle%2034624433%20(2).png)
Engagement-Aware Tiering
Not all vendor relationships carry the same risk. ComplyScore's engagement-aware tiering scores each relationship by scope, data sensitivity, criticality, and regulatory footprint to apply the right level of oversight automatically.
➡️ Risk-Based Assessment Depth
➡️ Automated Tier Assignment
➡️ Dynamic Re-Tiering
.png)
.png?width=909&height=619&name=Selection%20(23).png)
Multi-Factor Risk Scoring
ComplyScore® evaluates vendor risk using multiple contextual factors to determine the right level of oversight and response.
- Assesses vendor services, data types handled, operational impact, and applicable geographic regulations
- Applies tier-based scoring to determine assessment depth, evidence requirements, and monitoring frequency
- Enforces stricter remediation SLAs for higher-risk vendors while streamlining reviews for lower-risk engagements
.png?width=1125&height=821&name=Selection%20(20).png)
Tier-Driven Workflow Orchestration
ComplyScore® uses vendor risk tiers to automatically govern assessment depth, monitoring cadence, and remediation response.
- Applies comprehensive questionnaires and detailed evidence reviews for high-risk vendors
- Uses targeted assessments for medium-risk relationships and streamlined reviews for low-risk vendors
- Enables continuous monitoring, real-time alerts, tight SLAs, and executive escalation for critical vendors
.png?width=1066&height=972&name=Selection%20(19).png)
Dynamic Re-Tiering Keeps Risk Current
ComplyScore® continuously recalculates vendor risk tiers as new signals emerge, ensuring oversight stays aligned to real-world changes.
- Reassesses tiers based on credit events, cybersecurity alerts, and new data-handling responsibilities
- Automatically adjusts assessment scope and evidence requirements when risk levels change
- Activates continuous monitoring and tighter remediation SLAs as vendors move into higher-risk tiers
What Engagement-Aware Tiering Unlocks
Spend Time Where It Matters Most
Focus analyst effort on high-risk vendors instead of treating all relationships equally. Expand coverage across lower-tier vendors without adding headcount. Maintain defensible oversight proportional to actual exposure.
Right-Sized Reviews Prevent Over-Control
Avoid burying low-risk vendors in unnecessary paperwork. Give critical vendors the scrutiny they deserve with comprehensive evidence reviews. Match evidence requirements to risk levels so assessments stay efficient.
Respond Faster When Conditions Change
Automatically escalate oversight when vendor risk increases. Scale back monitoring when exposure decreases. Keep the program current without manual tier reviews.
Audit-Ready Tier Governance
Demonstrate policy-driven tier assignment with transparent scoring rules. Show complete tier change history with timestamps and justifications. Prove oversight scales appropriately across the vendor portfolio.
Atlas far exceeds our requirements...
One of the key differentiators between Atlas and other governance, risk and compliance and 3rd party risk management tools is the ease of use of the Atlas solutions. Also from a total cost of ownership perspective, Atlas far exceeds those requirements in terms of being very cost efficient in delivering all this.
ComplyScore is highly responsive and adaptable
ComplyScore is highly responsive and adaptable to our evolving processes and requirements, proving to be a trusted partner at every step. Their security analysts were knowledgeable, flexible, and delivered exceptional services that consistently exceeded our expectations.