Enrollment delays and roster drift are costing behavioral health networks. Here's the fix.  Get the eBook

Get a Demo

Verified Provider Data for Health Equity Index and NCQA Compliance

Directory errors hit underserved members hardest. When a listing is wrong for a member who already has fewer in-network options, it does not just frustrate them. It removes a viable care pathway entirely. With the CMS Health Equity Index now tied to STAR ratings, inaccurate provider data has become a quality, compliance, and revenue issue simultaneously.

Get a PRIME® demo
Verified Provider Data for Health Equity Index and NCQA Compliance

Why NCQA Compliance Matters for Health Plans

Members navigating care with fewer choices, whether because of geography, specialty scarcity, language needs, cultural fit, or accessibility requirements, carry no margin for error when they open your directory. A disconnected number or a panel marked open that closed six months ago does not just inconvenience them. It ends the care-seeking attempt.

The CMS CY2027 final rule reversed the Health Equity Index reward factor that was set to take effect under prior rulemaking. But the underlying data problem it was designed to address has not gone away. Members in underserved segments still experience the worst directory accuracy, the most access gaps, and the highest rate of failed care-seeking attempts. Plans that treat equity-attribute data with the same rigor as core provider demographics are better positioned on CAHPS member experience measures, network adequacy reviews, and NCQA accreditation regardless of how federal incentive structures shift. 

What Atlas PRIME® Delivers

PRIME® treats health equity as a data quality problem, because that is where equitable access is won or lost before a member ever makes a call. Every capability below ensures the attributes underserved members depend on most are verified, current, and findable when it matters. 

Members Find Providers That Match Their Actual Needs:

Language capability, accessibility features, cultural fit, and SDOH service offerings are verified at the source, so underserved members are not directed to providers who cannot serve them.

Access Gaps Become Visible Before Members Encounter Them:

Geographic and specialty shortfalls are surfaced as operational data, so network teams can act on equity gaps rather than learn about them through member complaints. 

The Booking Experience Matches the Directory Listing:

Provider offices are contacted directly to confirm what equity-sensitive members will actually experience when they call, catching discrepancies that automated validation alone cannot surface.

Every Equity Validation Event Is Documented and Defensible:

Source-cited, timestamped records give quality teams evidence-ready outputs for NCQA Health Outcomes Accreditation submissions and network adequacy reviews.

Equity-Critical Attributes Stay Current Between Outreach Cycles:

Panel status, language offerings, and accessibility designations are monitored continuously, not corrected after a member complaint surfaces the gap.

How PRIME® Helps Improve Your Health Equity Performance

Talk to us

Equity-Attribute Validation

Verifies language capability, cultural competence indicators, accessibility features, and SDOH service offerings against primary sources, not self-reported roster data.

Geographic Access Analytics

Maps adequacy and access gaps by ZIP code, census tract, specialty, and underserved segment so network teams can identify and close equity shortfalls before they affect members.

Continuous Monitoring

Detects changes to the attributes most likely to drift between cycles, including panel status, language offerings, accessibility designations, and location.

Secret Shopper Audits

Tests the actual booking experience for equity-sensitive member profiles, confirming that what the directory advertises is what the provider's office will confirm.

NCQA Health Outcomes Accreditation-Ready Outputs:

Produces structured, source-cited documentation ready for Health Outcomes Accreditation submissions and network adequacy evidence requirements.  

What Changes When Equity Data Is Accurate

Plans cannot demonstrate progress on health equity with incomplete or unreliable provider data. PRIME® applies the same validation rigor to equity attributes as it does to core provider demographics, so results are visible in member experience, STAR performance, and regulatory review. 

  • Measurable reduction in access disparities across underserved member segments

  • Higher satisfaction scores among members who historically encounter the worst directory experience

  • Stronger STAR performance on equity-weighted measures

  • Evidence-grade documentation for NCQA Health Outcomes Accreditation and network adequacy reviews

  • A defensible, data-level health equity narrative for regulators, employers, and the board

Proof in the Numbers

95%

Data confirmation accuracy reduces rework

100%

Of validation events source-cited for audit 

HEI

Health Equity Index-ready structured outputs